DAO Governance
Complete guide to participating in and managing DAO governance.
Understanding DAO Governance
What is Governance?
DAO governance is the process by which community members make collective decisions about the organization's direction, treasury, and operations through voting mechanisms.
Governance Principles
Decentralized: No single authority controls decisions
Transparent: All proposals and votes are public
Community-Driven: Members have equal voting rights
Automated: Smart contracts execute approved decisions
Participation Requirements
Basic Requirements
✅ NFT Ownership: Hold at least one NFT from the collection
✅ Wallet Connection: Connected Hyperliquid-compatible wallet
✅ Voting Period: Hold NFT during active voting period
Voting Power
1 NFT = 1 Vote: Equal voting rights for all members
No Delegation: Direct voting only (for now)
Snapshot System: Voting power captured when proposal is created
Proposal System
Creating Proposals
Access Proposal Creation
Go to Collection Page: Navigate to your DAO-enabled collection
Click "DAO" Tab: Access governance interface
Click "Create Proposal": Available to all NFT holders
Proposal Types
Treasury Proposals
Parameter Proposals
Contract Proposals
Proposal Requirements
Minimum NFTs: Usually 1-5 NFTs required to propose
Deposit: Small HYPE deposit (returned if proposal passes)
Clear Description: Detailed explanation of changes
Feasibility: Technically and financially viable
Voting Process
How to Vote
Find Active Proposals: Check "Proposals" section in DAO tab
Review Proposal Details: Read title, description, and justification
Cast Your Vote:
For: Support the proposal
Against: Oppose the proposal
Abstain: Neutral position
Voting Timeline
Vote Confirmation
Transaction Required: Each vote costs minimal gas
Irrevocable: Votes cannot be changed once cast
Public Record: All votes are visible on-chain
Decision-Making Rules
Quorum Requirements
Minimum Participation: Usually 5-20% of total NFTs
Why Required: Ensures decisions represent community will
Calculation: Based on total circulating supply
Approval Threshold
Simple Majority: 50% + 1 vote (most common)
Super Majority: 66% or 75% for important decisions
Unanimous: Rare, only for critical changes
Execution Conditions
✅ Quorum Met: Minimum participation achieved
✅ Approval Threshold: Required majority reached
✅ No Technical Issues: Smart contract can execute
✅ Timelock Passed: Waiting period completed
Treasury Management
Treasury Overview
Community Controlled: Majority funds managed by DAO
Transparent: All transactions visible on-chain
Proposal-Based: Spending requires community approval
Fund Allocation Process
Proposal Submission: Member proposes fund allocation
Community Review: Discussion and feedback period
Voting: Community votes on proposal
Execution: Approved funds are transferred
Treasury Categories
Marketing: Advertising and promotion
Development: Platform improvements
Community: Events and giveaways
Reserve: Emergency and future funds
Staking and Rewards
NFT Staking
Purpose: Increase governance participation
Benefits: Boosted voting power, rewards
Process: Lock NFTs in staking contract
Staking Rewards
Distribution: Regular reward payouts
Source: Treasury allocation or protocol fees
Calculation: Based on staking duration and amount
Unstaking Process
Lock Period: Minimum staking time required
Cooldown: Waiting period before withdrawal
Rewards Claim: Automatic reward distribution
Governance Best Practices
For Proposal Creators
Clear Communication: Explain proposal benefits clearly
Data-Driven: Support claims with data/evidence
Community Benefit: Ensure proposal helps all members
Feasibility: Technically and financially realistic
For Voters
Research First: Understand proposal implications
Long-term Thinking: Consider future impact
Active Participation: Vote on important proposals
Stay Informed: Follow proposal discussions
For DAO Maintainers
Regular Communication: Update community on governance
Proposal Quality: Encourage well-researched proposals
Participation Incentives: Reward active members
Education: Help members understand processes
Common Governance Scenarios
Marketing Campaigns
Proposal: "Allocate 15 HYPE for Twitter advertising campaign" Discussion: Target audience, expected reach, success metrics Voting: Community decides if campaign aligns with goals
Development Funding
Proposal: "Fund new collection website development" Discussion: Feature list, developer credentials, timeline Voting: Technical and design evaluation
Partnership Decisions
Proposal: "Partner with gaming platform for NFT integration" Discussion: Partnership terms, benefits, risks Voting: Strategic alignment assessment
Monitoring Governance
Key Metrics
Participation Rate: Percentage of NFTs voting
Proposal Success Rate: Approved vs rejected proposals
Treasury Health: Fund allocation efficiency
Community Satisfaction: Feedback and sentiment
Regular Reviews
Monthly Reports: Governance activity summaries
Proposal Analysis: Success/failure case studies
Parameter Tuning: Adjust governance settings
Community Feedback: Gather improvement suggestions
Troubleshooting
Cannot Create Proposal
Issue: "Insufficient voting power" Solution: Ensure you hold required NFTs
Issue: "Proposal threshold not met" Solution: Check minimum NFT requirements
Vote Not Counting
Issue: "Vote transaction failed" Solution: Check gas limit, retry transaction
Issue: "Already voted" Solution: Each address can only vote once per proposal
Proposal Not Executing
Issue: "Proposal approved but not executed" Solution: Check execution delay period, contact support
Active participation in DAO governance ensures your voice matters in the collection's future! 🗳️
Last updated
